January 28, 2026
Online visibility is often there: campaigns are running, the website gets traffic, and forms come in. Yet the feeling remains that the real opportunities are missing. Instead of concrete projects, you mainly receive “information requests,” vendor questions without a clear fit, or responses that simply don’t go anywhere.
In industrial B2B, this becomes painful fast. Solutions are technically complex, multiple decision-makers enter at different points, and the time from the first click to a purchase order is often weeks or months. Without sharp choices and clear quality boundaries, online marketing quickly turns into a funnel that mostly collects noise.
Everything that follows starts with clearly defining what online marketing should do here, and what it should not.
Online marketing in the industry only really works when you treat it as demand generation with quality control, not as an exercise in “more traffic.” Search, LinkedIn, and remarketing can all contribute, but only if they form a logical path toward a concrete use case and a decision-maker who can actually start a project.
Frameworks like “types of online marketing” or the “7 Ps” aren’t wrong, but they remain abstract until you translate them into two things that define industrial B2B: the buying stage and the DMU (Decision-Making Unit). In practice, that DMU is a mix of engineering, operations, procurement, and management—each with a different evaluation lens.
That also explains the most common frustration: “Why does online marketing in the industry generate mostly generic leads, but hardly any real projects?” Usually, because targeting and messaging are too generic, and the approach doesn’t steer around technical use cases and the decision-making unit. The foundation is not adding yet another channel, but connecting intent (Search) and ABM signals (LinkedIn/first-party) to measurable SQL criteria,immediately sharpening everything else.
Relevant inquiries come from choosing: who fits, who doesn’tfor what. A workable method is an ICP + use-case matrix in which messaging, targeting, and landing pages align per segment and application. In practice, this matrix enforces discipline: every campaign component must match one recognizable project type.
For example, the matrix can use segments such as machine builders (50–500 employees, Benelux/DACH), process industry sites (200–2,000 employees, NL/BE), and suppliers/components (20–200 employees, Benelux). For each segment, you define typical DMU roles (Plant Manager/Engineering/Procurement/Operations), dominant pains (downtime, capacity, compliance), and the matching search intent (quote/vendor/implementation). For LinkedIn, this explicitly includes job function, seniority, industry, and company size.
You then develop 3 profitable project types (use cases), each with its own requirements and a dedicated landing page. Retrofit/modernization often hinges on requirements like MTBF/uptime, safety/ATEX, lead time, and TCO. Automation/integration is driven by scope/compatibility, safety/ATEX where relevant, timeline,and TCO. Preventive maintenance/service contracts depend on uptime/risk, response time, compliance, and TCO.
By creating a core message and a dedicated page for each use case, much of the “generic lead” mismatch disappears. Inquiries contain context sooner (application, location, constraints), and the match with the right decision-maker becomes tighter. In practice, the time from first contact to order is often 6–20 weeks, depending on scope and internal alignment. With that foundation in place, channel selection becomes largely a question of timing and signal strength per buying stage.
Once ICP and use cases are clear, channel selection becomes a tool to organize buying intent and DMU reach in the right sequence. The key question becomes: where is market demand, and how does it move toward shortlisting and requesting? In industrial buying journeys, it is rarely a single step: it’s almost always multi-touch.
A phase-driven blueprint that’s often manageable combines three roles. Search captures high-intent terms with buying signals such as “quote,” “vendor,” “integration,” and “retrofit,” supported by tight negative keywords and landing pages for each intent/use case. LinkedIn ABM is designed for DMU reach via job titles, industry, and company size, enriched with matched lists (accounts/CRM), using use-case creatives and proof (cases/ROI where defensible and specific). Remarketing supports multi-touch via site engagers, video viewers, and (where permitted) CRM lists, using sequencing from awareness → proof → demo/quote.
A practical structure is campaigns per use case × phase. That keeps budgets, ads, and learnings clean, and it becomes obvious faster which use case builds a pipeline and which mainly attracts attention. Minimum assets usually come down to: 1 hero landing page per use case, 2–3 ads per intent cluster (Search) or per message variant (LinkedIn), 1 case/PDF per sector as a proof asset, and 1 conversion path (demo/quote/consult) with measurable SQL events.
Once this blueprint is in place, the biggest gains often come from actively keeping noise out of the system—not from buying more reach.
the
Noise is rarely “bad luck”; it usually comes from predictable choices. The most common mistakes are positioning too broadly (“everything for everyone”), sending traffic to a single general landing page, and measuring success by leads rather than SQL/pipeline. On top of that, the budget often leaks because there’s too little focus on negative keywords and sector filtering, so campaigns attract non-fitting intent (jobs, consumers, students, MRO noise).
This isn’t a one-time cleanup; it’s a weekly refinement. Think terms like vacancy, training, internship, pdf, manual, second-hand, brand-agnostic MRO terms, and consumer language. The impact is twofold: the budget is protected, and Search stays close to “project intent.”
Without hard filters on industry, company size, and seniority, LinkedIn quickly becomes “reach for the sake of reach.” By tightening these criteria and using account lists where possible, interest is less likely to hide behind shallow engagement, and response shifts toward relevance.
A general page invites general inquiries. A use-case page should force context: application, constraints (e.g., ATEX/safety), desired timeline, and scope. That makes the step to SQL much easier later, because the information is already in the inquiry.
Once noise is reduced, it becomes far more realistic to steer performance by quality, which requires a measurement plan beyond “number of leads.”
In industrial B2B, speed often comes not from more leads, but from better definitions and better feedback. A plan that works here connects marketing data to sales quality via clear stages and agreements that actually live in the CRM.
Define stages and criteria: MQL = complete + basic fit, SQL = meets 5–10 agreed criteria (industry, scope, company size, role, timing, application), and Opportunity = qualified chance with estimated value. Tie conversion actions to each step and import SQL/Opportunity as offline conversions from the CRM. This depends on consistent UTMs and naming conventions, so campaign → use case → phase remains traceable.
Reporting becomes concrete with KPIs such as cost per SQL, SQL rate per use case, and pipeline per channel. At the same time, it’s important to be explicit about attribution limits in long cycles: what you often can measure is first/last touch, assisted touches, and trends per cluster (use case, intent, account list). What you cannot measure one-to-one is the exact causality of a single ad across multiple stakeholders and touchpoints. That nuance prevents false certainty and helps you optimize consistently based on pipeline signals rather than “leads” or content activity.
With this measurement foundation, execution can start in short iterations without teams getting stuck in endless restructures.
The fastest path to improvement follows an order that respects dependencies: first, choices (ICP/use case); then, channel setup—with tracking and SQL definitions as prerequisites for learning at all. In practice, that order prevents debates later: when quality is defined upfront, optimization becomes far less subjective.
Pick 1–2 segments and 2–3 use cases, map DMU and pains, and prepare a hero landing page per use case. Immediately define the 5–10 criteria that make an SQL, so forms, intake, and CRM fields align.
Build a search per-intent cluster with strict negatives to drive to the right use-case pages. Set up LinkedIn ABM using industry/size/seniority and (where possible) matched lists. Start remarketing with simple sequencing: proof after engagement, only then quote/demo.
Enable offline conversion imports for SQL/Opportunity, verify UTM naming, and create an initial dashboard with Cost per SQL and SQL rate per use case. Then run a focused audit of search terms, placements, and landing-page conversions to capture insights quickly without budget leakage.
Resourcing is less about “training” or hourly rates and more about clear responsibilities: someone who can validate use-case content (engineering/operations), someone who owns SQL criteria (sales), and someone who manages campaigns and tracking (internal or external). Quick wins that almost always show impact: scaling negative keywords, splitting a general landing page into use cases, and pushing SQL back into platforms as a CRM conversion event. With that, the step toward a clear action plan becomes small.
Sharp ICPs and use cases enforce relevance, buying-stage-driven channel choices capture both intent and DMU reach, and measuring on SQL/pipeline prevents optimization from getting stuck on “leads.”
The logical next step is to review your current setup for noise, message match, landing pages, and the connection between ads and CRM, so the next weeks are about targeted improvements rather than more experiments.
Request a free “Industrial Growth Scan”: we’ll review your Google/LinkedIn setup, messaging, landing pages, and CRM tracking, and deliver a 30-day action plan with priorities, quick wins, and KPIs.
After completing the form we’ll get in touch to schedule a call. During this discovery call, we determine if and how we can help you.
