Dynamic balancing of fans and rotors: in situ or in the workshop, the grade to ask for, and the report
In short
Dynamic balancing corrects the uneven mass of a rotating part by adding or removing weight, either in its own bearings on site or on a balancing machine. Order a balance grade under ISO 21940-11:2016; a 2025/26 South African public specification asks for G6.3 on fans, citing the older ISO 1940. The report should show residual unbalance against the permissible value.
Headcore9 min read15 sources
What is dynamic balancing?
Dynamic balancing is the balancing of a rotating part or assembly in motion: weight is added or removed so that the rotor's mass centreline moves towards its axis of rotation and the rotor vibrates less at running speed.[13][12]
Unbalance means that the mass centreline and the geometric centreline of the rotor do not coincide. NASA's maintenance guide names the parasitic load from vibration caused by unbalance and misalignment as one of the leading causes of premature rolling-element bearing failure.[12]
On fans, unbalance often comes from the airstream: the US Department of Energy's fan sourcebook says contaminant build-up on fan blades "is often not uniform, resulting in imbalance problems", and that erosion and corrosion in harsh service can thin the blades and unbalance the impeller, in which case the impeller or the whole fan should be replaced.[13]
Vibration analysis can detect dynamic imbalance, a bearing problem or a motor winding problem before it gets worse, the same sourcebook notes. For how to buy a survey and read its report, see vibration analysis; for the motor's electrical side, ask an industrial electrician.[13]
When does a fan or rotor need dynamic balancing?
A rotor needs balancing when it is new or rebuilt, after wear or build-up has changed its mass, and when a vibration reading points to unbalance. NASA's guide recommends balance certification of all new and rebuilt machinery, with components such as the rotor, shafts and sheaves balanced individually and then trim balanced as an assembly.[12][13]
For fans in dusty or wet airstreams, cleaning comes first: the DOE sourcebook says such fans should be cleaned regularly, and notes that cleaning is often done only once dust build-up shows as vibration or poor performance.[13]
Low vibration alone does not prove a good balance. NASA's guide says "it is also not sufficient to balance a rotor until it achieves low vibration levels", and that precision balance methods "should include the calculation of residual imbalance".[12]
Should a fan be balanced in situ or in the workshop?
Balance in situ when the rotor can run in its own bearings and taking it out would cost teardown, reassembly and realignment; use a workshop balancing machine when the rotor is out anyway, is new or repaired, or is a component to be balanced before assembly.[12][14][4]
| Question | In situ (field) balancing | Workshop balancing machine |
|---|---|---|
| Where the rotor turns | In its own bearings and supporting structure | On a hard- or soft-bearing balancing machine |
| Suits | Installed rotors after long service, new installations and rebuilds; a final trim of an assembly | Components and assemblies before final assembly or installation, and rotors out for repair |
| What it saves or costs | No teardown, reassembly or realignment, and much less downtime | The rotor has to be removed, moved and refitted |
| Standard | ISO 21940-13:2012 for medium and large rotors: when in-situ balancing is appropriate, instrumentation, safety, reporting and records | ISO 21940-11:2016 for rigid rotors, ISO 21940-12:2016 for flexible rotors, ISO 21940-21:2022 for evaluating the machine |
| Watch for | Access to the rotor, which NASA's guide asks to be designed into the system | Keyed parts balanced with half-keys and marked (ISO 21940-32:2012) |
Which balance grade should you ask for?
Ask for the balance quality grade that fits the rotor, under ISO 21940-11:2016: G6.3 for fans, as a 2025/26 South African ventilation specification asks, and for other rotors the grade the table below gives their type.[1][15][12]
ISO 21940-11:2016 is the ISO standard for rotors with rigid behaviour. It specifies the magnitude of the permissible residual unbalance, the necessary number of correction planes, how the permissible residual unbalance is allocated to the tolerance planes, and how to account for errors in the balancing process.[1]
ISO 21940-11:2016 replaced ISO 1940-1:2003, which ISO withdrew on 9 November 2016, and was amended in 2022; its latest systematic review closed on 3 September 2026. Rotors with flexible behaviour fall under ISO 21940-12:2016.[1][2][3]
ISO 1940-1:2003 gave its recommendations for rigid rotors "according to their machinery type and maximum service speed", and specified how to verify the residual unbalance.[2]
That South African specification is the Mine Health and Safety Council's bid MHSC 011/2025-26 for an air-conditioning and ventilation installation. It requires axial flow fans to be balanced to ISO 1940, citing its 1973 edition, "within grade G6.3", and centrifugal fan impellers and shafts to grade G6.3.[15]
For fans of less than 300 kW, or driven by a standard electric motor of up to 355 kW, ISO 14694:2003 (amended in 2010) sets balance and vibration limits; its abstract refers more powerful fans to ISO 10816-3, which ISO 20816-3:2022 replaced before its own 2026 revision.[8][9]
What do G6.3, G2.5 and the other balance grades mean?
The grade number is a velocity in mm/s: the product of the permissible specific unbalance and the rotor's angular velocity at its maximum service speed. A lower number is a tighter balance, and the permissible residual unbalance grows with the rotor's mass. These examples are from the ISO 1940-1:1986 table, as NASA's 2008 guide reproduces it.[12]
| Grade | Permissible specific unbalance × angular velocity | Rotor examples |
|---|---|---|
| G16 | 16 mm/s | Parts of crushing machines and of agricultural machinery; individual engine components for cars, trucks and locomotives |
| G6.3 | 6.3 mm/s | Parts of process plant machines; centrifuge drums, fans, flywheels, pump impellers and general machinery parts; medium and large electric armatures (motors of at least 80 mm shaft height) without special requirements |
| G2.5 | 2.5 mm/s | Rigid turbo-generator rotors and turbo-compressors; medium and large electric armatures with special requirements; turbine-driven pumps |
| G1 | 1 mm/s | Grinding-machine drives; small electric armatures with special requirements |
| G0.4 | 0.4 mm/s | Spindles, discs and armatures of precision grinders; gyroscopes |
Sources:[12]
What should a balancing report show?
In practice, a balancing report should show the residual unbalance left in each correction plane against the permissible value for the grade you ordered, so you can check the result yourself.[12][1]
NASA's guide has the balance quality stated in the quotation, measured by a person trained and experienced in machinery balancing, whose qualifications go with the certification data, and signed by the purchaser's representative.[12]
ISO 21940-14:2026 sets out how to identify and assess errors in the unbalance measurement and take them into account when evaluating the residual unbalance, and ISO 21940-13:2012 sets reporting and record-keeping requirements for in-situ balancing.[5][4]
A report you can check holds these items:[12][1]
- the rotor: tag, type, mass in kg and maximum service speed in r/min, since the permissible residual unbalance depends on both;[12]
- the standard and grade ordered (ISO 21940-11:2016, grade G6.3, for example) and the permissible residual unbalance for each correction plane;[1]
- the residual unbalance before and after balancing in each plane, not only a vibration reading;[12]
- the correction weights and how they are fixed: welded, riveted, or bolted with a hardened bolt and a locking device; NASA's guide accepts clip-on weights only on centrifugal fans, and no stick-on lead weights or solder;[12]
- for a keyed shaft, the key convention used: half-keys under ISO 21940-32:2012, with the parts marked;[7][12]
- for in-situ work, the vibration at once running speed (1X) before and after, the narrowband value NASA's default acceptance limits use, since "an overall value is not acceptable";[12]
- the name and qualifications of the person who balanced the rotor.[12]
What does South African law require when a fan is balanced on site?
In South Africa, the Driven Machinery Regulations, 2015 make the user cause every shaft, pulley, wheel, gear, coupling and similar revolving part to be "securely fenced or guarded", and every driving belt, rope or chain to be guarded, unless it is in such a position or of such construction that it is as safe as it would be if it were (regulation 3).[10]
The regulations apply to the operation, repair, maintenance, inspection and testing of driven machinery (regulation 2).[10]
A balancing company working on your site is a mandatary, which the Occupational Health and Safety Act defines to include "a contractor or a subcontractor for work" (section 1). Section 37(1) presumes that an employer or user did what its employee did, and section 37(2) applies this to a mandatary "except if the parties have agreed in writing to the arrangements and procedures between them to ensure compliance by the mandatary with the provisions of this Act", so put those arrangements in writing with the balancing company.[11]
What to put in your request
- The machine: tag, type (fan, blower, pump or motor), rotor mass in kg, maximum service speed in r/min and power in kW.[12][8]
- In situ or in the workshop; for in-situ work, whether the machine can run at service speed, the shutdown window and the access to the rotor.[4][12]
- The standard and grade: ISO 21940-11:2016 with the grade you need (a 2025/26 South African ventilation specification asks for G6.3), or ISO 21940-12:2016 for a flexible rotor.[1][3][15]
- The latest vibration report, with the reading at once running speed (1X), and the symptom you see.[12]
- How correction weights are fixed: welded, riveted, or bolted with a hardened bolt and locking device; no stick-on lead weights or solder.[12]
- For keyed shafts, balancing with half-keys under ISO 21940-32:2012 and the parts marked.[7]
- The balancer's name and qualifications, and who removes and refits the guards for each run.[12][10]
- A price that shows any extra cost of meeting the balance quality as its own itemised section.[12]
Questions buyers ask
Is G2.5 better than G6.3?
G2.5 is tighter: the grade number is the product of the permissible specific unbalance and the angular velocity, so a lower number allows less residual unbalance. In the ISO 1940-1:1986 table that NASA reproduces, G6.3 covers fans and pump impellers, and G2.5 turbo-compressors and turbine-driven pumps. NASA's guide has any extra cost of meeting a specified balance quality quoted as a separate, itemised section.[12]
Can a fan be balanced without removing it?
Yes, by field balancing: balancing the rotor in its own bearings and supporting structure, which avoids teardown, reassembly and realignment. ISO 21940-13:2012 sets the criteria and safeguards for in-situ balancing of medium and large rotors, including its safety implications, and can be used as a basis for the contract.[12][14][4]
Which standard replaced ISO 1940-1?
ISO 21940-11:2016, Procedures and tolerances for rotors with rigid behaviour, replaced ISO 1940-1:2003, which ISO withdrew on 9 November 2016. ISO 21940-14:2026, published on 30 September 2026, replaced the 2012 edition of the part on assessing balance errors. A specification that still cites ISO 1940, as a 2025/26 South African HVAC bid cites its 1973 edition, can be updated to ISO 21940-11.[1][2][5][15]
Sources
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-11:2016 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 11: Procedures and tolerances for rotors with rigid behaviour (edition 1, with Amd 1:2022; catalogue entry, abstract and life cycle), November 2016.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 1940-1:2003 Mechanical vibration: balance quality requirements for rotors in a constant (rigid) state, Part 1: Specification and verification of balance tolerances (withdrawn; catalogue entry and life cycle), August 2003.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-12:2016 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 12: Procedures and tolerances for rotors with flexible behaviour (catalogue entry and abstract), April 2016.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-13:2012 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 13: Criteria and safeguards for the in-situ balancing of medium and large rotors (catalogue entry and abstract), March 2012.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-14:2026 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 14: Procedures for assessing balance errors (edition 2; catalogue entry, abstract and life cycle), September 2026.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-21:2022 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 21: Description and evaluation of balancing machines (catalogue entry and abstract), November 2022.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 21940-32:2012 Mechanical vibration: rotor balancing, Part 32: Shaft and fitment key convention (catalogue entry and abstract), March 2012.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 14694:2003 Industrial fans: specifications for balance quality and vibration levels (with Amd 1:2010; catalogue entry and abstract), March 2003.
- International Organization for Standardization (ISO), ISO 20816-3:2022, Part 3: Industrial machinery with a power rating above 15 kW and operating speeds between 120 r/min and 30 000 r/min (withdrawn; catalogue entry and life cycle), October 2022.
- Department of Labour (Government Gazette 38905), Driven Machinery Regulations, 2015 (GN R. 540), 24 June 2015.
- Government Gazette 14918, Occupational Health and Safety Act 85 of 1993, 2 July 1993.
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Reliability-Centered Maintenance Guide for Facilities and Collateral Equipment (sections 5.5.1 and 7.6, Appendix H: Balance Standard, and glossary), September 2008.
- US Department of Energy and AMCA International, Improving Fan System Performance: A Sourcebook for Industry, April 2003.
- Ludeca, The Difference Between Field Balancing and Shop Balancing, 5 April 2022.
- Mine Health and Safety Council, Bid MHSC 011/2025-26: air-conditioning and ventilation installation, full project specification, undated (bid year 2025/26), read November 2026.